Business

Does anyone think that self-management is a good idea?

Can you imagine a company where all of its employees (and not just a select few) are empowered to make important decisions that affect their work? Where anyone can not only make suggestions about what will work best for clients, but also create and lead teams to implement solutions to problems raised.

For the hundreds of thousands of employees around the world who work for companies that have adopted self-directed management structures, this is how they work every day.

Recently, Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh made headlines for shifting that company to a self-management structure called Holacracy, where everyone operates in “circles” and there are no internal “Manager” titles, yet more experienced employees are given a mentoring role to fulfill within the company.

Journalists around the world have tried to make sense of it: the common thread is “without managers, everything will be chaos!” However, as usual with these things, everything old is new again.

Actually, you probably know someone who works on these types of systems. You may have even worked on one yourself. In fact, approximately 10% of organizations worldwide have adopted some form of self-management.

For nearly 25 years, corporate giant 3M has been one of many business organizations employing self-directed work teams they call “Pods.” They have been shown to be 30-50% more effective than their traditional counterparts.

The benefits of using a “capsule” system, according to senior 3M employees, are numerous. In addition to offering obvious corporate benefits such as increased flexibility, reduced operating costs, improved quality, productivity and service, they also offer cultural benefits.

For example, with the pod structure, there are simpler job classifications. Employees tend to feel more valued for their individual contribution, which increases their commitment to the organization as a whole. The company can communicate its objectives and employees can act accordingly without feeling hampered by the management bureaucracy above them.

Other companies such as Xerox, Federal Express, Johnson & Johnson, Procter and Gamble, and AT&T have credited their self-directed teams with increasing the quality of customer service, reducing service errors, achieving multi-million dollar inventory reductions, increasing production profits, and Reduce staffing needs. while increasing efficiency. Simply by giving their existing employees the ability to make the changes they felt were most necessary, their companies were able to succeed.

One reason is the cross-functional nature of these teams. In each group or circle, no one person has full responsibility for a project. If someone is unable to fully contribute, it will be addressed quickly. And, in the event of a “missing man,” the equipment can still function without any downtime.

If these teams are more successful, does that mean it’s right for everyone?

There are some elements of self-management that can work in any organization, however, a complete turnaround like the one 3M and Zappos have done lends itself better to certain industries. I have personally seen this type of structure work wonderfully in the airline and technology industries.

It’s about being at a company with a strong vision that is clearly communicated so that when employees take action, they know the company has their back.

And really, that’s all that matters anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *